Talk:ATK Reference: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* Shouldn't we do this with a <nowiki>[[category:reference]]</nowiki> on pages, so we get an automatic alphabetized list? --[[User:Ivo|Ivo]] 22:49, 22 August 2006 (CEST) | * Shouldn't we do this with a <nowiki>[[category:reference]]</nowiki> on pages, so we get an automatic alphabetized list? --[[User:Ivo|Ivo]] 22:49, 22 August 2006 (CEST) | ||
* We could but isn't this a bit more user friendly? I still want to restructure this a bit though, add a lot more links. I was also planning to add some visual representations of modules, nodes, etc. To improve the look and usability. Something we can't do with a simple category listing. Adding a category listing is a very good idea, we could add a link to it on this page. | * We could but isn't this a bit more user friendly? I still want to restructure this a bit though, add a lot more links. I was also planning to add some visual representations of modules, nodes, etc. To improve the look and usability. Something we can't do with a simple category listing. Adding a category listing is a very good idea, we could add a link to it on this page. --[[User:Boy|Boy]] 23:20, 22 August 2006 (CEST) | ||
--[[User:Boy|Boy]] 23:20, 22 August 2006 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:20, 22 August 2006
- Shouldn't we do this with a [[category:reference]] on pages, so we get an automatic alphabetized list? --Ivo 22:49, 22 August 2006 (CEST)
- We could but isn't this a bit more user friendly? I still want to restructure this a bit though, add a lot more links. I was also planning to add some visual representations of modules, nodes, etc. To improve the look and usability. Something we can't do with a simple category listing. Adding a category listing is a very good idea, we could add a link to it on this page. --Boy 23:20, 22 August 2006 (CEST)